Objectives: Deep-brain stimulation (DBS) has been used for the treatment of medically refractory dystonia with excellent results. In this study, we compared in detail the therapeutic advantages of two DBS targets for generalized isolated dystonia. Methods: In this retrospective study, we recruited 29 patients with generalized isolated dystonia who had undergone DBS treatment targeting either the globus pallidus interna (GPi) or the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in the Department of Functional Neurosurgery at Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China, between January 2016 and December 2021. The movement and disability subscales of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS) were used to assess the severity of their dystonic symptoms and their activities of daily living, respectively. SF-36 was used to evaluate the patients' health-related quality of life. Results: The percentage improvement in the BFMDRS-M score at 6 months relative to the baseline score was clearly higher in the STN group (63.91%) than in the GPi group (38.36%). At the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups, the percentage improvement in arm symptoms was significantly higher after DBS of the STN (70.64%, 80.66%, and 76.89%, respectively) than after stimulation of the GPi (36.75%, 34.21%, and 38.47%, respectively). At 12 months after surgery, patient quality of life had improved on all SF-36 subscales in both groups. Conclusions: STN-DBS may have more advantages than GPi-DBS in patients with obvious arm dystonia. STN-DBS had a better clinical effect than GPi-DBS within 6 months after surgery.

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment option for refractory dystonia, but the improvement among the patients is variable. To describe the outcomes of DBS of the subthalamic region (STN) in dystonic patients and to determine whether the volume of tissue activated (VTA) inside the STN or the structural connectivity between the area stimulated and different regions of the brain are associated with dystonia improvement. The response to DBS was measured by the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFM) before and 7 months after surgery in patients with generalized isolated dystonia of inherited/idiopathic etiology. The sum of the two overlapping STN volumes from both hemispheres was correlated with the change in BFM scores to assess whether the area stimulated inside the STN affects the clinical outcome. Structural connectivity estimates between the VTA (of each patient) and different brain regions were computed using a normative connectome taken from healthy subjects. Five patients were included. The baseline BFM motor and disability subscores were 78.30 ± 13.55 (62.00-98.00) and 20.60 ± 7.80 (13.00-32.00), respectively. Patients improved dystonic symptoms, though differently. No relationships were found between the VTA inside the STN and the BFM improvement after surgery (p = 0.463). However, the connectivity between the VTA and the cerebellum structurally correlated with dystonia improvement (p = 0.003). These data suggest that the volume of the stimulated STN does not explain the variance in outcomes in dystonia. Still, the connectivity pattern between the region stimulated and the cerebellum is linked to outcomes of patients. A estimulação cerebral profunda (ECP) é um tratamento estabelecido para distonias refratárias. Porém, a melhora dos pacientes é variável. O objetivo do estudo foi descrever os desfechos da ECP da região do núcleo subtalâmico (NST) e determinar se o volume de tecido ativado (VTA) dentro do NST ou se a conectividade estrutural entre a área estimulada e diferentes regiões cerebrais estão associadas a melhora da distonia. MéTODOS:  A resposta da ECP em pacientes com distonia generalizada isolada de etiologia hereditária/idiopática foi mensurada pela escala de Burke-Fahr-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFM) antes e 7 meses após a cirurgia. A soma dos volumes do NST nos dois hemisférios foi correlacionada com a melhora nos escores do BFM para avaliar se a área estimulada dentro do NST afeta o desfecho clínico. A conectividade estrutural estimada entre o VTA de cada paciente e as diferentes regiões cerebrais foram computadas usando um conectoma normativo retirado de indivíduos saudáveis. Cinco pacientes com idade de 40,00 ± 7,30 anos foram incluídos. O BFM motor e de incapacidade basal eram de 78,30 ± 13,55 (62,00–98,00) e 20,60 ± 7,80 (13,00–32,00), respectivamente. Os pacientes melhoraram com a cirurgia, mas com variabilidade. Não houve relação entre o VTA dentro do NST e a melhora do BFM após a cirurgia (p = 0.463). Entretanto, a conectividade estrutural entre o VTA e o cerebelo correlacionaram com a melhora da distonia (p = 0.003). CONCLUSãO:  Os dados sugerem que o VTA dentro do NST não explica a variabilidade do desfecho clínico na distonia. Porém, o padrão de conectividade entre a região estimulada e o cerebelo foi relacionada com o desfecho dos pacientes.

Few studies have focused on subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for refractory isolated dystonia, and the long-term outcomes are unclear. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of subthalamic stimulation for generalized isolated dystonia for more than five years and explored the factors predicting clinical outcomes. A total of 16 patients with generalized isolated dystonia underwent a two-phase procedure for stimulation system implantation. After implanting the leads, we performed a test stimulation and observed the stimulation response. The severity of dystonia was assessed using a blinded rating of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale based on videos recorded at scheduled times. The mean follow-up time was 7.4 ± 2.2 years (5-12.5 years). The severity of dystonia improved significantly one year after surgery. The movement score decreased from 49.3 (40.9) points at baseline to 26.5 (43.5) points (-44.6%) at six months, 12.0 (22.5) points (-66.8%) at one year, 11.25 (17.6) points (-72.7%) at three years, and 12.5 (21.0) points (-72.6%) at the last follow-up. The improvement in motor symptoms resulted in a corresponding improvement in activities of daily living. Greater long-term outcomes were correlated with early stimulation responses, lower baseline movement scores, and female sex. When analyzed comprehensively, only the baseline movement score had meaningful predictive value for the outcome. Our results indicate that subthalamic stimulation is effective and durable in treating generalized isolated dystonia. The subthalamic nucleus may be an alternative target for the treatment of refractory dystonia. Patients with less severe motor symptoms may benefit more from this treatment.

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is increasingly used in pediatric patients affected by isolated dystonia, with excellent results. Despite well documented long-term effects on motor functioning, information on quality of life and social adaptation is almost lacking. The present study aims to explore the experience of illness and the relation with the device in adult patients suffering from dystonia who underwent DBS surgery in pediatric age. A narrative inquiry approach was used to collect patients' narratives of their experience with dystonia and DBS stimulator. A written interview was administered to 8 patients over 18 years old with generalized isolated dystonia who had undergone pallidal DBS implantation in childhood. A thematic analysis was realized to examine the narratives collected. Five main themes emerged: "relationship with the disease", "experience related to DBS procedure", "relationship with one's own body", "fears", "thoughts about future". Despite a general satisfaction in relation to DBS intervention, some patients expressed difficulties, such as the acceptance of changes in one's own body, concerns and fears regarding the device and the future, also considering the critical phase of transition from childhood to adulthood. These results suggest that further research is needed to understand the contribution of psychological, as much as medical, aspects to the overall outcome of the intervention. The present explorative study encourages a deeper investigations of psychological aspects of patients, in order to plan a tailored care path and to decide whether to suggest a psychological support, both before and after the intervention.

Although an increasing number of trials are reported on the treatment of generalized or segmental isolated dystonia, the minimal clinically important difference thresholds for the most frequently reported outcome measures are still undetermined. To estimate the minimal clinically important difference for the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey in generalized or segmental dystonia. A total of 898 paired examinations of 198 consecutive patients, aged >18 years, with idiopathic and inherited (torsin family 1 member A positive) segmental and generalized isolated dystonia were analyzed. To calculate the minimal clinically important difference thresholds, both anchor- and distribution-based methods were used simultaneously. Any improvement >16.6% or worsening larger than 21.5% on the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale indicates a minimal, yet clinically relevant, change. Threshold values for the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Disability Scale were 0.5 points for both decline and improvement. Cut-off scores for the Physical Component Summary, the Mental Component Summary, and the Global (Total or Overall) Score of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey were 5.5 and 5.5, 6.5 and 7.5, and 7.5 and 8.5 points for clinically meaningful improvement and deterioration, respectively. The minimal clinically important difference represents the smallest change in an outcome measure that is meaningful to patients. Our estimates for the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey may allow more reliable judgment of the clinical relevance of different treatments for segmental and generalized isolated dystonia. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.