Corneal dystrophies are phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous, often resulting in visual impairment caused by corneal opacification. We investigated the genetic cause of an autosomal dominant corneal stromal dystrophy in a pedigree with eight affected individuals in three generations. Affected individuals had diffuse central stromal opacity, with reduced visual acuity in older family members. Histopathology of affected cornea tissue removed during surgery revealed mild stromal textural alterations with alcianophilic deposits. Whole genome sequence data were generated for four affected individuals. No rare variants (MAF < 0.001) were identified in established corneal dystrophy genes. However, a novel heterozygous missense variant in exon 4 of SPARCL1, NM_004684: c.334G > A; p.(Glu112Lys), which is predicted to be damaging, segregated with disease. SPARC-like protein 1 (SPARCL1) is a secreted matricellular protein involved in cell migration, cell adhesion, tissue repair, and remodelling. Interestingly, SPARCL1 has been shown to regulate decorin. Heterozygous variants in DCN, encoding decorin, cause autosomal dominant congenital stromal corneal dystrophy, suggesting a common pathogenic pathway. Therefore, we performed immunohistochemistry to compare SPARCL1 and decorin localisation in corneal tissue from an affected family member and an unaffected control. Strikingly, the level of decorin was significantly decreased in the corneal stroma of the affected tissue, and SPARCL1 appeared to be retained in the epithelium. In summary, we describe a novel autosomal dominant corneal stromal dystrophy associated with a missense variant in SPARCL1, extending the phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity of inherited corneal disease.

To present the clinical, genetic, and histopathological features of the ninth family affected by congenital stromal corneal dystrophy (CSCD) to date. Twelve cases of a Spanish family affected by CSCD were analyzed regarding history, visual acuity (VA, decimal scale), an ophthalmologic exam and specular microscopy. Five eyes were treated by deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), and thirteen eyes by penetrating keratoplasty (PK). In the two last generations, a genetic study was performed. Most of the patients affected were born with opaque corneas except for three, whose corneas were clear at birth. Biomicroscopy showed a whitish diffuse stromal opacity with an unaltered epithelium, causing poor VA (from hand motions to 0.4). Patients treated with PK presented mean postoperative VA of 0.19±0.20 over a follow-up time of 235.3±101.4months with 38% recurrences. Patients who underwent DALK experienced VA improvement to 0.17±0.11 over a follow-up time of 10.8±2.6months without signs of recurrence. In the latter, the big bubble technique was not achieved, so a manual technique was performed. The genetic study showed heterozygosis for a 1-bp deletion at nucleotide 962 in exon 8 of the decorin gene. CSCD is a rare entity, which should be treated by DALK whenever possible, obtaining better results than PK. Close monitoring of children of affected individuals is important, because CSCD can progress during the early years of life.

The purpose of this study was to highlight characteristic clinical and microscopic findings and report the long-term follow-up of pediatric excimer laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty (excimer-PKP) for congenital stromal corneal dystrophy (CSCD). A 2-year-old Greek child presented with CSCD at our department. Clinical examination showed bilateral flake-like whitish corneal opacities affecting the entire corneal stroma up to the limbus. Genetic testing identified a mutation of the decorin gene (c.962delA). The variant was not present in the parents and represented a de novo mutation. The uncorrected visual acuity was 20/100 in both eyes. Excimer-PKP (8.0/8.1 mm) was performed on the right eye at the age of 2.5 years and on the left eye at the age of 3 years. Postoperatively, alternating occlusion treatment was performed. The light microscopic examination demonstrated a disorganized extracellular matrix of the corneal stroma characterized by a prominent irregular arrangement of stromal collagen lamellae with large interlamellar clefts containing ground substance, highlighted by periodic acid-Schiff- and Alcian blue-positive reaction detecting acid mucopolysaccharides. Electron microscopy showed disorganization and caliber variation of collagen lamellae and thin filaments within an electron-lucent ground substance. The postoperative course was unremarkable. Both grafts remained completely clear 14 years postoperatively. Corneal tomography showed moderate regular astigmatism with normal corneal thickness. The corrected distance visual acuity was 20/25 in both eyes. Excimer-PKP for CSCD might be associated with excellent long-term results and a good prognosis, particularly when the primary surgery is performed at a very young age. However, this requires close postoperative follow-up examinations by an experienced pediatric ophthalmologist to avoid severe amblyopia.

Corneal dystrophies are hereditary diseases affecting the corneal tissue; they are bilateral, symmetrical and unrelated to environmental or systemic conditions. Congenital corneal stromal dystrophy is a very rare autosomal dominant dystrophy that is caused by a mutation in the DCN gene that encodes decorin (a proteoglycan of the extracellular matrix). We herein report 4 cases of congenital stromal corneal dystrophy in 2 families, highlighting the previously undescribed histopathologic features, the possible differential diagnosis of this entity and the key role played by decorin staining in its diagnosis. Corneal dystrophy (CD) is most recently defined as a collection of rare hereditary non-inflammatory disorders of abnormal deposition of substances in the cornea. CD was coined in 1890 by Arthur Groenouw and Hugo Biber, and the efforts of Ernst Fuchs, Wilhelm Uhthoff, and Yoshiharu Yoshida solidified the foundation of the understanding of these diseases. As proposed in 2015 by the International Classification of Corneal Dystrophies (IC3D), CD is sub-classified by the anatomic location affected: epithelial/subepithelial, epithelial-stromal, stromal, and endothelial dystrophies. Discoveries and unique case studies continue to broaden our understanding and classification of these diseases; therefore, it is difficult to categorize every single dystrophy solely into these four major labels.   The objective of this article is to present an overview of the evaluation and management for the most prominent and understood variants of CD. Highlights of these dystrophies will be discussed. However, further in-depth discussion on these dystrophies will be in separate StatPearls articles.  Patients with CD can be asymptomatic, but if symptoms occur, they typically experience bilateral visual acuity loss, typically in the form of irregular astigmatism. Depending on the corneal layer affected, patients may also manifest with photophobia, dry eyes, corneal edema, and recurrent corneal erosions, especially with epithelial-based CD, which causes considerable pain. Symptoms can begin at any age, depending on the diagnosis. Treatment can range from conservative measures to corneal transplantation.   CD is a significant but rare ocular disease. The genetic component of this disease is important for patients to understand, especially for affected patients involved with family planning. As we begin to understand genetics in greater detail, better evaluation and treatments for CD will come to fruition.  The objective of this article is to present an overview of the general evaluation and management for the most prominent and understood variants of CD. Highlights of these dystrophies will be covered, but the author intends to elaborate on these dystrophies separately in other StatPearls articles. The variants of CD based on their new anatomic classifications in IC3D are:  Epithelial and subepithelial dystrophies  : Epithelial basement membrane corneal dystrophy (EBMCD), also previously known as map-finger-dot dystrophy, Cogan microcystic dystrophy, and anterior basement membrane dystrophy. . Epithelial recurrent erosion dystrophies (EREDs) which includes Franceschetti corneal dystrophy, dystrophia smolandiensis, and dystrophia helsinglandica . Subepithelial mucinous corneal dystrophy (SMCD) . Meesmann corneal dystrophy (MECD) also known as juvenile epithelial corneal dystrophy . Lisch epithelial corneal dystrophy (LECD) . Gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy (GDLD) . Epithelial-Stromal Dystrophies (still included under epithelial and subepithelial dystrophies) : Lattice corneal dystrophy (LCD), with its subtypes: type I (TGFBI mutation) and type II (familial amyloidosis Finnish type), including LCD variants . Granular corneal dystrophy (GCD), types I and II (Avellino-type)  . Reis-Bückler’s corneal dystrophy (RBCD) . Thiel-Behnke corneal dystrophy (honeycomb dystrophy) (TBCD) . Stromal dystrophies: Macular corneal dystrophy (MCD)  . Schnyder corneal dystrophy (SCD)  . Congenital stromal corneal dystrophy (CSCD)  . Fleck corneal dystrophy (FCD)  . Posterior amorphous corneal dystrophy (PACD)  . Pre-Descemet corneal dystrophy (PDCD)  . Central cloudy dystrophy of francois (CCDF) . Endothelial Corneal Dystrophies: Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD)  . Posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPCD)  . Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED)  . X-linked endothelial corneal dystrophy (XECD) .

Small leucine rich proteoglycans (SLRPs) are the largest family of proteoglycans, with 18 members that are subdivided into five classes. SLRPs are small in size and can be present in tissues as glycosylated and non-glycosylated proteins, and the most studied SLRPs include decorin, biglycan, lumican, keratocan and fibromodulin. SLRPs specifically bind to collagen fibrils, regulating collagen fibrillogenesis and the biomechanical properties of tissues, and are expressed at particularly high levels in fibrous tissues, such as the cornea. However, SLRPs are also very active components of the ECM, interacting with numerous growth factors, cytokines and cell surface receptors. Therefore, SLRPs regulate major cellular processes and have a central role in major fundamental biological processes, such as maintaining corneal homeostasis and transparency and regulating corneal wound healing. Over the years, mutations and/or altered expression of SLRPs have been associated with various corneal diseases, such as congenital stromal corneal dystrophy and cornea plana. Recently, there has been great interest in harnessing the various functions of SLRPs for therapeutic purposes. In this comprehensive review, we describe the structural features and the related functions of SLRPs, and how these affect the therapeutic potential of SLRPs, with special emphasis on the use of SLRPs for treating ocular surface pathologies.