Meningiomas, renowned for their histological diversity, are one of the most prevalent brain tumors. Some meningiomas show unusual histomorphology, especially in intraoperative rapid diagnosis. Therefore, clinical and radiological information is crucial for pathological diagnosis. Before the 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System(5th edition), pathological diagnosis relied solely on histopathological features. However, this classification introduced new diagnostic criteria for anaplastic meningiomas, which now include TERT promoter mutations and the homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B, indicating the necessity of genetic analysis. Some rhabdoid and papillary meningiomas have BAP1 alterations, which tend to demonstrate an aggressive clinical course and may represent a phenotype of BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome. Heterozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B and loss of H3 p.K28me3(K27me3)are also associated with poor prognosis. Although some immunohistochemical markers like MTAP may serve as surrogates for the homozygous deletion of CKKN2A/B, genetic analysis is required to confirm TERT promoter mutations. Therefore, in routine clinical practice, neurosurgeons and pathologists prioritize appropriate formalin fixation to facilitate genetic analysis using pathological specimens.

Skin cancers represent the most common malignancy worldwide. In children, the diagnosis of skin cancer is rare and raises the possibility of an underlying genetic predisposition. Recent molecular advances have increased understanding of certain genetically determined regulatory pathways that constantly protect the skin from atypical cell growth and cancer. Knowledge about these underlying gene defects aids a dermatologist's ability to recommend confirmatory genetic testing and provides potential targets for future therapies. In this review, we outline genetic conditions important to dermatologists that are associated with skin cancer development and review the current approaches to the management of these patients.

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a rare aggressive neoplasm arising from mesothelial lining of body cavities, most commonly pleura and peritoneum. It is characterised by a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. A universally recognised risk factor for the development of MM is exposure to asbestos. However, evidence supporting a genetic susceptibility to the development of MM has been accumulating during the last decades. Intensive research for the identification of MM susceptibility genes has led to the discovery of BAP1 and to the definition of the so-called "BAP1-related tumour predisposition syndrome". Patients carrying germline BAP1 mutations have an increased risk for the early development of tumours, including MMs, uveal melanomas, cutaneous melanocytic lesions, clear cell renal cell carcinomas and basal cell carcinomas. Furthermore, pathogenic variants in tumour suppressor genes with a role in DNA repair have been recently described in families with clustered MM cases. These genetic alterations seem to confer exaggerate sensitivity to asbestos carcinogenic effect and, arguably, increased response to specific chemotherapeutic strategies. While the translational significance of BAP1 alterations is explored in the research field, the identification of families carrying germline BAP1 mutations is mandatory to start appropriate surveillance programs and guarantee the best clinical management to these patients.

Pathogenic BAP1 germline variants cause a tumor-predisposition syndrome (BAP1-TPDS) linked to uveal melanoma, mesothelioma, cutaneous melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma. Surveillance of carriers of pathogenic BAP1 variants provides an opportunity for early tumor detection; however, there are no evidence-based guidelines for management of BAP1-TPDS, nor health economic evaluation; this study aims to provide this evidence. We created a Markov microsimulation health state transition model of BAP1 germline carriers to predict if active surveillance for the four main tumors influences survival and improves associated economic costs with a time horizon of 100 years from the perspective of the healthcare system (N = 10,000). Model inputs were derived from data published by the BAP1 Interest Group Consortium and other studies. Management and healthcare costs were extracted from Australian costing schedules (final figures converted to US dollars [USD]), and outcomes compared for individuals receiving surveillance with those in a nonsurveillance arm. Robustness was evaluated on 10,000 iterations of a 100-sample random sampling of the model output. On average, surveillance of BAP1 carriers increased survival by 4.9 years at an additional cost of $6,197 USD for the healthcare system including surveillance costs ($1,265 USD per life year gained). The nonsurveillance arm had more diagnosed late tumors (62.8% v 10.7%) and a higher rate of BAP1-related deaths (50.2% v 35.4%; a 29.5% increase). The model was cost-effective under all sensitivity analyses. Our secondary robustness analysis estimated that 99.86% of 100-sample iterations were cost-effective and 19.67% of these were cost-saving. It is recommended that carriers of BAP1 germline variants are identified and undertake active surveillance, as this model suggests that this could improve survival and be cost-effective for the healthcare system.

Melanocytic BAP1-associated intradermal tumors (MBAITs) can either be sporadic or associated with a cancer-predisposition syndrome. In this study we explored the clinical status of 136 patients in which at least one MBAIT was found. 49/136 (36%) of them gave their signed consent for an oncogenetic BAP1 blood test. 28/136 patients (20%) diagnosed with an MBAIT had other MBAITs and/or a personal or familial history of BAP1-related cancers that could clinically designate them as potential carriers of a BAP1 germline mutation. 17 of these 28 patients underwent oncogenetic testing. A deleterious mutation of BAP1 was confirmed in 12/17 cases. 4/17 cases were wild-type; all had a single MBAIT and a history of skin melanoma. A variant of unknown significance was found in one case with multiple MBAITs. Among the 12 mutated cases, multiple MBAITs were present in 10/12 cases and were the only clinical sign in 4/12 cases. The remaining 32/49 blood-tested cases with an isolated MBAIT were wild type for BAP1 in 25/32 cases or showed a variant of unknown significance in 7/32 cases. We recommend, following the diagnosis of a MBAIT, performing a BAP1 immunohistochemistry in all other cutaneous melanocytic tumors removed previously or simultaneously and all skin melanomas. This screening could help clinicians prioritize which patients would most benefit from oncogenetic testing.