Pure partial trisomy 16q12.1q22.1 is a rare chromosome copy number variant (CNV). The primary clinical phenotypes associated with this syndrome include abnormal facial morphology, global developmental delay (GDD), short stature, and reported predisposing factors for atypical behavior, autism, the development of learning disabilities, and neuropsychiatric disorders. The dosage-sensitive genes associated with partial trisomy are not disclosed preventing to establish a genotype-phenotype correlation. We report a case of a Chinese patient diagnosed with GDD and an abnormal facial shape, who was found to have partial trisomy 16 through karyotyping and high-throughput sequencing analysis. Karyotype and CNV tracing analyses were also conducted on the biological parents of the patient to assess for any chromosomal structural abnormalities. Additionally, we included 29 patients with pure partial trisomy 16q, reported in the DECIPHER database and the literature. We and performed a genotype-phenotype correlation analysis. The proband, a 2-year-old female, was found to have a de novo 21.96 Mb duplication located between 16q12.1q22.1, with no other deletions observed on other chromosomes, indicating a pure partial trisomy of 16q. Through genotype and phenotype analysis of 29 individuals, we found that patients with the duplicated region located at the distal region of 16q may exhibit more severe symptoms than those with duplication at the proximal region; however, no relationship was identified between phenotype and the size of the duplicated segment. We report, for the first time, a patient with partial trisomy 16q validated by multiple genetic tests, including CNV-seq, whole exome sequencing (WES), and karyotyping. It is speculated that partial trisomy of 16q may be associated with continuous gene duplication. However, functional studies are necessary to identify the causative gene or critical region linked to duplication syndrome of chromosome 16q.

Prenatal investigations are usually performed to diagnose severe or associated forms of hypospadias. However, the value of this workup and the correlation with the postnatal diagnosis and follow-up have not been studied in the literature. The aims of the study were to describe postnatal outcomes. We conducted a single-center retrospective study. We included fetuses with a prenatal suspicion of isolated hypospadias (no associated ultrasound abnormality). Postnatal findings were described including neonatal examination with confirmation of the diagnosis or not of hypospadias, the diagnosis of isolated or associated hypospadias, investigations and management. A total of 21 patients with a suspicion of isolated hypospadias on prenatal ultrasound and available postnatal follow-up were included. The diagnosis of hypospadias was confirmed at neonatal examination for 17/21 (81 %) children. All 17 confirmed cases underwent at least one urological surgical procedure. Postnatally, the diagnosis of hypospadias in 4/17(23.5 %) cases was found to be associated with the following diagnosis: Denys-Drash syndrome, deletion of chromosome9 and duplication of chromosome20 involved in genital development, significant duplication of the short arm of chromosome 16, mosaic karyotypic abnormality [45, X (64 %)/46, XY (36 %)]. The hormonal assessment revealed 3/17(17.6 %) abnormalities: one diagnosis of partial androgen insensitivity syndrome and two cases of gonadal dysgenesis with low AMH and inhibin B. Prenatal diagnosis of isolated hypospadias may be associated with postnatal genetic abnormalities. In this context, a prenatal assessment by amniocentesis with chromosomal microarray analysis can be an option after discussion with the woman.