For chronic congenital endocrine conditions, age at diagnosis is a key issue with implications for optimal management and psychological concerns. These conditions are associated with an increase in the risk of comorbid conditions, particularly as  it concerns growth, pubertal development and fertility potential. Clinical presentation and severity depend on the disorder and the patient's age, but diagnosis is often late. To evaluate age at diagnosis for the most frequent congenital endocrine diseases affecting growth and/or development. This observational cohort study included all patients (n = 4379) with well-defined chronic congenital endocrine diseases-non-acquired isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD), isolated congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (ICHH), ectopic neurohypophysis (NH), Turner syndrome (TS), McCune-Albright syndrome (MAS), complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) and gonadal dysgenesis (GD)-included in the database of a single multisite reference center for rare endocrine growth and developmental disorders, over a period of 14 years. Patients with congenital hypothyroidism and adrenal hyperplasia were excluded as they are generally identified during neonatal screening. Median age at diagnosis depended on the disease: first year of life for GD, before the age of five years for ectopic NH and MAS, 8-10 years for IGHD, TS (11% diagnosed antenatally) and CAIS and 17.4 years for ICHH. One third of the patients were diagnosed before the age of five years. Diagnosis occurred in adulthood in 22% of cases for CAIS, 11.6% for TS, 8.8% for GD, 0.8% for ectopic NH, and 0.4% for IGHD. A male predominance (2/3) was observed for IGHD, ectopic NH, ICHH and GD. The early recognition of growth/developmental failure during childhood is essential, to reduce time-to-diagnosis and improve outcomes.

The syndrome of impaired GH secretion (GH deficiency) in childhood and adolescence had been identified at the end of the 19th century. Its non-acquired variant (naGHD) is, at childhood onset, a rare syndrome of multiple etiologies, predominantly characterized by severe and permanent growth failure culminating in short stature. It is still difficult to diagnose GHD and, in particular, to ascertain impaired GH secretion in comparison to levels in normally-growing children. The debate on what constitutes an optimal diagnostic process continues. Treatment of the GH deficit via replacement with cadaveric pituitary human GH (pit-hGH) had first been demonstrated in 1958, and opened an era of therapeutic possibilities, albeit for a limited number of patients. In 1985, the era of recombinant hGH (r-hGH) began: unlimited supply meant that substantial long-term experience could be gained, with greater focus on efficacy, safety and costs. However, even today, the results of current treatment regimes indicate that there is still a substantial fraction of children who do not achieve adult height within the normal range. Renewed evaluation of height outcomes in childhood-onset naGHD is required for a better understanding of the underlying causes, whereby the role of various factors - diagnostics, treatment modalities, mode of treatment evaluation - during the important phases of child growth - infancy, childhood and puberty - are further explored.

Regular monitoring of serum IGF-I levels during growth hormone (GH) therapy has been recommended, for assessing treatment compliance and safety. To investigate serum IGF-I SDS levels during GH treatment in children with GH deficiency, and to identify potential determinants of these levels. This observational cohort study included all patients (n = 308) with childhood-onset non-acquired or acquired GH deficiency (GHD) included in the database of a single academic pediatric care center over a period of 10 years for whom at least one serum IGF-I SDS determination during GH treatment was available. These determinations had to have been carried out centrally, with the same immunoradiometric assay. Serum IGF-I SDS levels were determined as a function of sex, age and pubertal stage, according to our published normative data. Over a median of 4.0 (2-5.8) years of GH treatment per patient, 995 serum IGF-I SDS determinations were recorded. In addition to BMI SDS, height SDS and GH dose (P < 0.01), etiological group (P < 0.01) had a significant effect on serum IGF-I SDS levels, with patients suffering from acquired GHD having higher serum IGF-I SDS levels than those with non-acquired GHD, whereas sex, age, pubertal stage, treatment duration, hormonal status (isolated GHD (IGHD) vs multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD)) and initial severity of GHD, had no effect. These original findings have important clinical implications for long-term management and highlight the need for careful and appropriate monitoring of serum IGF-I SDS and GH dose, particularly in patients with acquired GHD, to prevent the unnecessary impact of potential comorbid conditions.

Growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) has recently been classified as secondary IGF-I deficiency but the significance of IGF-I measurement in diagnosing GHD is still discussed. The aim of the study was to assess the relationships between IGF-I secretion and GH therapy effectiveness in children with GHD. The analysis comprised 300 children with isolated, non-acquired GHD (GH peak below 10 μg/l) who completed GH therapy and attained final height (FH). In all patients IGF-I concentration was measured before the treatment and IGF-I deficiency was diagnosed if IGF-I SDS for age and sex was below -1.0. The following auxological indices were assessed: patients' height SDS before treatment (H₀SDS), FH SDS and improvement of FHSDS vs. H₀SDS (ΔHSDS). In the patients with IGF-I deficiency when compared with those with normal IGF-I secretion before treatment, significantly better FH SDS (-1.42±0.90 vs. -1.74±0.86, p=0.004) and ΔHSDS (1.64±1.01 vs. 1.32±1.05, p=0.010) were observed, despite similar H₀SDS (- 3.07±0.78 vs. - 3.11±0.77, p=0.63) and GH peak (7.0±3.1 μg/l vs. 6.8±2.1 μg/l, p=0.55). The patients who achieved FH over 10(th) centile had significantly lower IGF-I SDS before treatment than those with FH below 10(th) centile (- 1.59±1.54 vs. - 1.20±1.64, p=0.04), despite similar GH peak (7.0±2.3 μg/l vs. 6.7±3.1 μg/l, p=0.45). The patients with ΔHSDS over the median value had significantly lower IGF-I SDS than those with ΔHSDS below the median value (- 1.59±1.71 vs. - 1.09±1.47, p<0.0001), despite similar GH peak (6.8±2.5 μg/l vs. 7.0±2.7 μg/l, p=0.86). In children with isolated, non-acquired GHD, secondary IGF-I deficiency is an important predictor of better GH therapy effectiveness.