This study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET for spinal cord lesions. Paired preoperative 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FET PET/MRI scans were conducted on patients with suspected spinal cord tumors. Clinical manifestations and PET performance, including SUVmean, SUVmax, TBRmean, TBRmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion metabolism (TLM), and tumor volume, were compared using group analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Thirty-five patients were categorized into three groups based on their pathological diagnosis: high-grade tumors (HGTs, n = 6), low-grade tumors (LGTs, n = 19), and non-tumor diseases (NTDs, n = 10). The background SUVmean of 18F-FET PET was significantly lower than that of 18F-FDG PET (p < 0.0001), while the delineated tumor volumes showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The mass SUVmean, SUVmax, MTV, and TLM values of both 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FET PET were statistically different between HGTs and LGTs (p < 0.05). Similarly, the mass SUVmax, TBRmax, MTV, and TLM values of both 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FET PET, as well as the mass SUVmean of 18F-FET PET, exhibited statistical differences between HGTs and NTDs (p < 0.05). But none were able to distinguish LGTs and NTDs (p > 0.05). Notably, 18F-FET PET provided valuable supporting diagnostic evidence in 1 case of mixed neuronal-glial tumor (MNGT) and 2 cases of intramedullary inflammatory lesions. Optimal cut-off values of all measured parameters for distinguishing tumors and NTDs were determined through ROC analysis. 18F-FET PET presented comparable diagnostic performance to 18F-FDG PET in differentiating HGTs, LGTs, and NTDs, but exhibited particular utility in MNGT and inflammatory lesions.

Benign glioma broadly refers to a heterogeneous group of slow-growing glial tumors with low proliferative rates and a more indolent clinical course. These tumors may also be described as "low-grade" glioma (LGG) and are classified as WHO grade I or II lesions according to the Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS) (Louis et al. in Acta Neuropathol 114:97-109, 2007). Advances in molecular genetics have improved understanding of glioma tumorigenesis, leading to the identification of common mutation profiles with significant treatment and prognostic implications. The most recent WHO 2016 classification system has introduced several notable changes in the way that gliomas are diagnosed, with a new emphasis on molecular features as key factors in differentiation (Wesseling and Capper in Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 44:139-150, 2018). Benign gliomas have a predilection for younger patients and are among the most frequently diagnosed tumors in children and young adults (Ostrom et al. in Neuro Oncol 22:iv1-iv96, 2020). These tumors can be separated into two clinically distinct subgroups. The first group is of focal, well-circumscribed lesions that notably are not associated with an increased risk of malignant transformation. Primarily diagnosed in pediatric patients, these WHO grade I tumors may be cured with surgical resection alone (Sturm et al. in J Clin Oncol 35:2370-2377, 2017). Recurrence rates are low, and the prognosis for these patients is excellent (Ostrom et al. in Neuro Oncol 22:iv1-iv96, 2020). Diffuse gliomas are WHO grade II lesions with a more infiltrative pattern of growth and high propensity for recurrence. These tumors are primarily diagnosed in young adult patients, and classically present with seizures (Pallud et al. Brain 137:449-462, 2014). The term "benign" is a misnomer in many cases, as the natural history of these tumors is with malignant transformation and recurrence as grade III or grade IV tumors (Jooma et al. in J Neurosurg 14:356-363, 2019). For all LGG, surgery with maximal safe resection is the treatment of choice for both primary and recurrent tumors. The goal of surgery should be for gross total resection (GTR), as complete tumor removal is associated with higher rates of tumor control and seizure freedom. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT), while not typically a component of first-line treatment in most cases, may be employed as adjunctive therapy in high-risk or recurrent tumors and in some select cases. The prognosis of benign gliomas varies widely; non-infiltrative tumor subtypes generally have an excellent prognosis, while diffusely infiltrative tumors, although slow-growing, are eventually fatal (Sturm et al. in J Clin Oncol 35:2370-2377, 2017). This chapter reviews the shared and unique individual features of the benign glioma including diffuse glioma, pilocytic astrocytoma and pilomyxoid astrocytoma (PMA), subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA), pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA), subependymoma (SE), angiocentric glioma (AG), and chordoid glioma (CG). Also discussed is ganglioglioma (GG), a mixed neuronal-glial tumor that represents a notable diagnosis in the differential for other LGG (Wesseling and Capper 2018). Ependymomas of the brain and spinal cord, including major histologic subtypes, are discussed in other chapters.

Low-grade gliomas (LGG) and mixed neuronal-glial tumors (MNGT) show frequent MAPK pathway alterations. Oncogenic fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) tyrosinase kinase domain has been reported in brain tumors of various histologies. We sought to determine the frequency of FGFR1 hotspot mutations N546 and K656 in driver-unknown LGG/MNGT and examined FGFR1 immunohistochemistry as a potential tool to detect those alterations. We analyzed 476 LGG/MNGT tumors for KIAA-1549-BRAF fusion, IDH1/2, TERT promotor, NF1, H3F3A and the remaining cases for FGFR1 mutation frequency and correlated FGFR1 immunohistochemistry in 106 cases. 368 of 476 LGG/MNGT tumors contained non-FGFR1 alterations. We identified 9 FGFR1 p.N546K and 4 FGFR1 p.K656E mutations among the 108 remaining driver-unknown samples. Five tumors were classified as dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT), 4 as pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) and 3 as rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor (RGNT). FGFR1 mutations were associated with oligodendroglia-like cells, but not with age or tumor location. FGFR1 immunohistochemical expression was observed in 92 cases. FGFR1 immunoreactivity score was higher in PA and DNT compared to diffuse astrocytoma, but no correlation between FGFR1 mutation in tumors and FGFR1 expression level was observed. FGFR1 hotspot mutations are the fifth most prevailing alteration in LGG/MNGT. Performing FGFR1 sequencing analysis in driver-unknown low-grade brain tumors could yield up to 12% FGFR1 N546/K656 mutant cases.

Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor (DLGNT) is a rare mixed neuronal-glial tumor of central nervous system. Chromosome microarray usually identifies co-deletion of the short arm of chromosome 1 and the long arm of chromosome 19 as well as fusion of the KIAA1549 and BRAF genes. We describe a case of a 3-year-old boy with typical imaging and histopathological features, but without KIAA1549-BRAF fusion and 1p deletion. Additionally, a literature review is performed summarizing the clinical features, management, and prognosis of this rare entity. A 3-year-old boy presented with chronic headache and vomiting. On initial MRI scanning, diffuse thickening with enhancement of the cerebral and spinal leptomeninges could be detected after contrast injection. Multiple cystic lesions were found located on infratentorial leptomeninges, with progressive thickening of leptomeninges and increasing cysts on follow-up MRI after 9 months. Meningeal biopsy was carried out, showing that most of tumor cells were composed of oligodendroglioma-like cells. The tumor cells were immunopositive for GFAP, Olig-2, and synaptophysin but negative for IDH-1 and H3k27M. Molecular genetic testing did not detect KIAA1549-BRAF fusion, 1p deletion, or 1p/19q co-deletion. The patient was finally diagnosed as DLGNT after multidisciplinary team consultation. Given that the clinical and pathological mechanism of DLGNTs remains unclear, our case gives supplement about the diversity of molecular genetic characteristics. Combination of clinical, neuroradiological, and histopathological data is particularly important for the diagnosis of DLGNTs, till now.

Papillary glioneuronal tumors (PGNTs) are classified as a type of World Health Organization grade I mixed neuronal-glial tumor. Most PGNTs involve cystic formations with mural nodules and solid components in the cerebral hemispheres, and PGNTs occur mainly in young adults. The long-term prognosis of PGNTs remains unclear. A 38-year-old male had been diagnosed with an arachnoid cyst associated with epilepsy in a local hospital. The initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study showed the tumor as a heterogeneously enhanced nodule in the left postcentral gyrus. Subsequent MRI studies showed slow growth of the tumor for 26 years. He underwent gross total resection to control his epilepsy. The histopathological findings revealed pseudopapillary structures involving hyalinized blood vessels with a single or pseudostratified layer of cuboidal glial cells with round nuclei and scant cytoplasm. At the periphery of the lesion, Rosenthal fibers and acidophilic granule bodies were observed in the gliotic brain tissue. Immunohistochemically, some interpapillary cells were positive for NeuN. On the basis of these findings, the tumor was diagnosed as a PGNT. This PGNT showed slow growth for 26 years. When recognizing a slowly growing tumor in the cerebral hemispheres of relatively young people that is associated with epileptic seizures, PGNT should be considered as a differential diagnosis.